X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <43FA8F88.4040607@serv.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:56:56 -0800
From: L Anderson <lowella AT serv DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Curious about cygcheck -s' comment on vi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I ran "cygcheck -s" on my system and noticed the comment "Not found: 
vi". A search of the web and Cygwin archives seems to indicate that vi 
is not a Cygwin package and it doesn't show up in Setup.  Therefore, the 
comment seems a bit like saying that oat meal is cholesterol free or 
"Not found: elephants".  :-)

Just curious.

Regards,

L Anderson


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/