X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20060219185059.8875.qmail@web51505.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:50:59 -0800 (PST)
From: "James R. Phillips" <antiskid56-cygwin AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: antiskid56-cygwin AT yahoo DOT com
Subject: Re: ghostscript-8.50 packaging question
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

OK, I see your point.  I would need to verify, however, that the duplicated
file names are in fact duplicate files.

I guess my main point is that the current package layout may be non-optimal,
but that doesn't actually affect the correct installation and operation of the
software.  Thus I will likely wait for a real bug report before I do a new
release.  But I appreciate the suggestions, and will try to incorporate them at
the time a new release does become imperative.




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/