X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Updated: xemacs-21.5.23-1/xemacs-tags-21.5.23-1/xemacs-emacs-common-21.5.23-1 References: <438C3A42 DOT 3000601 AT mycom-int DOT fr> <43F874F8 DOT 5060102 AT mycom-int DOT fr DOT invalid> From: "Dr. Volker Zell" Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:36:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <43F874F8.5060102@mycom-int.fr.invalid> (Shaddy Baddah's message of "Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:39:04 +0100") Message-ID: <82slqf5pir.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (cygwin32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >>>>> Shaddy Baddah writes: > Hi, > On 11/29/2005 12:23 PM, Shaddy Baddah wrote: >> Hi. >> Dr. Volker Zell wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> A new *TEST* version of 'xemacs' has been uploaded to a server near you. >> Thank you very much Volker. This version is exactly what I have been >> hoping for, for quite a while (Chinese characters in utf8 encodings, and >> msw toolkit). >> Thanks also, of course, to the Cygwin & Xemacs developers and >> community. > The appreciation sentiment expressed above still holds. But I am > curious how this package got the Good To Go? > I could find anything under cygwin-apps ml indicating it, and it seems > to be missing the patch file that is required to compile "out of the > box"? Yes, thanks for the report. It's a packaging error which will be fixed in the next test release 21.5.24. > Regards, > Shaddy Ciao Volker -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/