X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:18:30 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygpath problem Message-ID: <20060217121830.GC1372@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Feb 17 00:23, Hans Horn wrote: > Folks, > > according to the cygpath manpage, I should get the following, given a short > DOS name, e.g. c:\Progra~1: > > cygpath -wl C:\Progra~1 --> C:\Program Files > cygpath -ml C:\Progra~1 --> C:/Program Files > > however, the -m option completely ignores the '-l' flag, and I get instead > cygpath -ml C:\Progra~1 --> C:/Progra~1 > cygpath -m C:\Progra~1 --> C:/Progra~1 > > Which is "right", cygpath or its manpage? The manpage. I fixed cygpath to do the "right thing(tm)". Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/