X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:49:12 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygheap base mismatch detected Message-ID: <20060215234912.GB28690@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <000d01c53b5a$59cf4b20$75986686 AT doas DOT iup DOT physik DOT unibremen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:22:30PM +0000, Jens Dill wrote: >What you write makes it appear that CygWin simply will not support >large executables that reference the CygWin DLL and are also launched >from a CygWin shell. I can't believe that nobody has found a better >workaround than: > > (a) not using the CygWin DLL (not an option for us) > (b) not launching from a CygWin shell (not an option for us) > (c) reducing the memory space required by the program (again, not possible) > (d) tinkering randomly with the stack size > >Does anyone else know of another way around this problem? How about: (e) Looking into the source code and coming up with a fix rather than a workaround ? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/