X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:26:22 -0800 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: default PATH Message-ID: <20060212202622.GA556@efn.org> References: <021120062022 DOT 25491 DOT 43EE478C000D242F0000639322007456720A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> <20060212120318 DOT GS14219 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20060212165700 DOT GD6042 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060212165700.GD6042@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:57:00AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > If we don't get a single person indicating that they rely on the current > behavior then I'm ok with changing it. We have a patch ready to be > checked in, in fact. I assume that: $ PATH="/foo::$PATH" cmd /c printenv PATH will continue to show /foo:./:yaddayadda with the patch? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/