X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <43EF2488.9030407@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:05:28 -0800
From: Tim Prince <tprince AT myrealbox DOT com>
Reply-To: tprince AT computer DOT org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050921
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna AT efn DOT org>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: make: rm: command not found
References: <2872950 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <20060210163356 DOT GZ4275 AT implementation DOT labri DOT fr> <2873151 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <7 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 20060211031407 DOT 01de85e8 AT computer DOT org> <20060212095623 DOT GE3260 AT efn DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <20060212095623.GE3260@efn.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:15:37AM -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
> 
>>At 08:40 AM 2/10/2006, JefV wrote:
>>
>>>--
>>>View this message in context: 
>>>http://www.nabble.com/make%3A-rm%3A-command-not-found-t1100243.html#a2873151
>>>Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>>>Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>>>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>>>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>SPAM: ---------------------- Spamnix Spam Report ----------------------
>>>SPAM: Spamnix identified this message as spam.
>>>SPAM: Score: 52
>>>SPAM: Action: Quarantine
>>>SPAM: ------------------- End of Spamnix Spam Report ------------------
>>
>>How many of us do you expect to be viewing your message with spam 
>>filtering off?
> 
> 
> Why should your spam filtering be of any concern to anyone posting to
> the list?
> 
> Perhaps if you were to figure out what contributed to that 52 score
> and make a concrete suggestion, it would be helpful.
> 
You don't think that the nabble URL and ad have any effect on spam 
filter triggering?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/