X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: "'Cygwin List'" Subject: RE: once more unto the breech - still hanging, but I have a little more info. Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:55:37 -0000 Message-ID: <002c01c62da2$0844b430$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <17387.32837.712874.423702@segfault.lan> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 09 February 2006 17:48, John W. Eaton wrote: >>> You just dumped 5 meg of useless spam into the inboxes of several >>> thousand people. You just ate up dozens of gigabytes of >>> sourceware.org's bandwidth, which are a scarce resource, paid for >>> out of hard-earned donations and sponsorship. > > Sorry to waste additional bandwith with this potentially obvious > question, but if this is a big problem, then why not place limits on > the size of posts going to the list? > > jwe Well, if you're asking me, it's because I don't have any administrative privs over sourceware.org! But I do think it would be a good idea. In fact, I'm fairly sure that there used to be just such a limit, and overly-large strace or cygcheck output used to trip it. I don't know when or why it might have been lifted. BTW respect is due to Peter for saying sorry so nicely! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/