X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:38:42 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: mismatched dll
Message-ID: <20060203013842.GB7678@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <020220062158 DOT 387 DOT 43E28079000ACE870000018322007507440A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> <20060203013712 DOT GC17485 AT brasko DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060203013712.GC17485@brasko.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:37:12PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:58:17PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>>There's always another alternative - propose to maintain your package
>>as part of the official cygwin distribution.  Then you just point
>>people to cygwin.com, and source code distribution becomes cygwin.com's
>>problem instead of yours.
>
>OK, here I do have some evidence to support me when I say you are
>partially wrong.
>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00064.html So, that is
>not a good alternative.

I retract my veto.  If this is submitted via normal channels, I will have
no objections.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/