X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-Id: <1138561042.21433.253029430@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: "Brett Serkez" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, "Vadim Oganesyan" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Subject: Re: bizarre g++ behavior after reinstalling cygwin In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:57:22 -0500 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Note-from-DJ: This may be spam > "i=i++" is either a no-op or nonsense, depending on the > interpretation. You should either use "i=i+1" or "i++" (those should > be equivalent in modern compilers). The strick interpretation of i=i++ starts by evaluating the right side "i++" to compute a r-value (right value). Since the ++ is after the i, it is a post-operation, vs. if it were before the i, in which case it would be a pre-operation. So first the value of i would be saved, then i incremented, then the saved value would be assigned to the l-value (left value) which in this case is i, setting i back to its original value. You could use "i=++i" which would increment i, then save the r- value and assign to the l-value, but then again, i++ would be much simplier, no? Brett ---------------------------------------------------------------- Brett C. Serkez, Techie -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/