X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <43D88F83.5060401@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:59:47 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: curses.h (Attn: bash and setup maintainers) References: <20060120172639 DOT GA15196 AT brasko DOT net> <20060121142951 DOT GA20108 AT brasko DOT net> <43D24CD0 DOT 5000508 AT byu DOT net> <20060121151547 DOT GD32082 AT brasko DOT net> <43D27E86 DOT 3010006 AT byu DOT net> <20060121201329 DOT GA9039 AT brasko DOT net> <20060123145013 DOT GA9308 AT brasko DOT net> <20060123161412 DOT GB9308 AT brasko DOT net> <43D63084 DOT 7030302 AT byu DOT net> <43D7875D DOT 1050602 AT byu DOT net> In-Reply-To: <43D7875D.1050602@byu.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eric Blake wrote: > Yes, but the devil is in the details. I'm trying to come up with some > sort of generic solution where you add a file > CYGWIN-PATCHES/upstream_patches.lst, whose contents (if the file exists) > is a list of patch files that should be bundled into the patch tarball, > and which should be applied before generating the cygwin-specific diff. > Then, based on the existance of CYGWIN-PATCHES/upstream_patchlist, g-b-s > would generate either a plain foo-1.1-1.patch (no upstream patches > provided), or a tarball foo-1.1-1.patch.tar.bz2 with both the upstream and > cygwin patches. > Take a look at the build script for ncurses; it might contain some useful code. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/