X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <6910a60601252311j3a967f16t@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:11:23 +0100
From: Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
Reply-To: Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: new cygwin dlls
In-Reply-To: <20060126040648.GE20309@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <012620060339 DOT 28204 DOT 43D84462000B51C000006E2C22007374780A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> 	 <20060126040648 DOT GE20309 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id k0Q7Ball010119

2006/1/26, Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:39:14AM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>Has a fix been found for building emacs on the new cygwin versions 5.19
> >>and up yet?
> >
> >Yes - browse the list archives - the idea is that anywhere that emacs
> >uses a non-zero d_ino to mean the entry returned from readdir is valid,
> >just add a small patch to that area of code that treats ALL directory
> >entries as valid without reading d_ino.
>
> FWIW, it looks like some of our highly trained on-staff programmers may
> have a plan for resurrecting an all-singing/all-dancing d_ino for every
> platform but NT4.
>
> So, expect d_ino in a snapshot soon - back in Cygwin by popular demand.
> And, if you're using NT4 - well sorry.  You can blame that programmer or
> programmers for not being clever enough to figure out how to make it
> work there.

So seperate emacs binaries for NT4 and Win95, besides the good >= XP?
--
Reini Urban
http://phpwiki.org/
http://spacemovie.mur.at/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/