X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:00:26 -0800 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new cygwin dlls Message-ID: <20060126070026.GA2628@efn.org> References: <43D83751 DOT 7000902 AT it DOT to-be DOT co DOT jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43D83751.7000902@it.to-be.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:43:29AM +0900, djh wrote: > Has a fix been found for building emacs on the new cygwin versions > 5.19 and up yet? > > There is at least one problem with d_ino as you know. I thought you said you'd worked around that (though you didn't share what your actual changes). > An possibly another, since temacs crashes with a stack dump, > during bootstrap. I saw you made a partial report of this, and but didn't see any response to the person who tried to help a step further in your investigation via gdb. > cygwin distribution has an early emacs in it. Will it still run on > the newer 5.19 versions? Has any regression testing been carryied out? Yes. > Has anyone been assigned to look into these problems? s/been assigned/volunteered/ you mean? Nobody gets assigned or paid to do anything, unless perhaps through a RedHat support contract. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/