X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:28:50 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Errors compiling cdrtools under cygwin 1.5.19 Message-ID: <20060125032850.GA17373@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <012420061825 DOT 2204 DOT 43D671090006A0AD0000089C22092299270A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> <20060124183552 DOT GA2889 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <43D69F82 DOT 8050209 AT verysmall DOT org> <20060125024631 DOT GC4272 AT efn DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060125024631.GC4272@efn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:46:31PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >The only care that really could be taken to prevent things like this >is more users testing pre-release versions. Development snapshots of >cygwin with getline() have been available for a long time now. Note >that this isn't just addressed to you; if package maintainers heeded >the "release coming soon, please test a snapshot" messages cgf sends >out by testing that their packages build and run with the snapshot, >there'd be less scope for problems. Thank you, for making this point Yitzchak! Can I get two gold stars for over here? I should point out that I didn't rebuild my packages under 1.5.19 either so I'm just as guilty as any other package maintainer in this regard. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/