X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <43D63EE9.8040603@verysmall.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:51:21 +0100
From: "pobox AT verysmall DOT org" <pobox AT verysmall DOT org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.6a1 (Windows/20060119)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.2 crashes diring import...
References: <43D56D71 DOT 8050008 AT verysmall DOT org>        <43D5D0C4 DOT 9030004 AT verysmall DOT org> <210 DOT 22 DOT 146 DOT 67 DOT 1138107049 DOT wm AT webmail DOT inode DOT at>
In-Reply-To: <210.22.146.67.1138107049.wm@webmail.inode.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Reini Urban wrote:
> I see in your previous mail, that your cygserver SHM settings
> are already at the maximum. Hope that your have that much RAM/Virtual Memory.

I did this just desperately looking for solution, but seems the problem 
is not there.

> Your problem:
> 9 [main] postmaster 656 transport_layer_pipes::connect: lost
> connection to cygserver, error = 121
> 
> Can you try running cygserver with -d. For testing best started from the
> console, not as service. Maybe within a sysbash to have the same
> permissions.

Yes, I did that but did not include it in the e-mail, as I did not see 
anything meaningful there (no obvious error message). I'll do it again 
and send it to the list in the next 2-3 days (lost time the last 1-2 
days with this).

> BTW: My cygwin packages 8.06 and 8.1.2 to test against are at
> the setup User Url: http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/

I went back to 8.0.4. I need something which I understand how it happens 
and why. Thanks, however.

> I haven't tested yet such a big 3-4GIG import, a huge index might need
> more than with 8.0, but the heavy and parallel regressions do all pass
> so far.

OK I'll do the -d option and then we will see if we can do something.

Thanks for your input,
Iv


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/