X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:26:34 -0500 (EST) From: Igor Peshansky Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Eric Blake cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: curses.h (Attn: bash and setup maintainers) In-Reply-To: <43D63084.7030302@byu.net> Message-ID: References: <20060120172639 DOT GA15196 AT brasko DOT net> <20060121142951 DOT GA20108 AT brasko DOT net> <43D24CD0 DOT 5000508 AT byu DOT net> <20060121151547 DOT GD32082 AT brasko DOT net> <43D27E86 DOT 3010006 AT byu DOT net> <20060121201329 DOT GA9039 AT brasko DOT net> <20060123145013 DOT GA9308 AT brasko DOT net> <20060123161412 DOT GB9308 AT brasko DOT net> <43D63084 DOT 7030302 AT byu DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Igor Peshansky on 1/23/2006 9:34 AM: > > > Most of the messages are diagnostics to track script progress. The only > > exceptions are the lines below: > > > > ./00bash.sh.done: line 12: ./01bash.bat: No such file or directory > > cp: cannot stat `./01bash.bat.t': No such file or directory > > rm: cannot remove `./01bash.bat.t': No such file or directory > > > > The first set is from 00bash.sh (it should probably have a test for the > > existence the .bat file). Also, in-place edits should work just fine > > (using 'sed -i -e "/^echo/d; s,REM BASHPATH,$bashpath," 01bash.bat'). > > Duly noted; bash-3.1-2 will improve on this situation (whenever I get > time to get that working; I'm still struggling with gracefully > incorporating upstream patches without wiping them out by rerunning > g-b-s prep). Does make sense? > Actually, now that setup.exe has been updated to use /bin/bash and not > /bin/sh, the technical reason for me needing two postinstall scripts in > the first place has been overcome, so I may just simplify back to a > single script that does it all, rather than staging it through a .bat. You can't, unfortunately. Some people may have older versions of setup.exe on their systems, and blatantly disregard setup's warning that a newer version is available. Those systems will then fail to install sh properly. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu | igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!) |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte." "But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac" -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/