X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <43D5E862.7060304@verysmall.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:42:10 +0100
From: "pobox AT verysmall DOT org" <pobox AT verysmall DOT org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.6a1 (Windows/20060119)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: apache 1.3.34 can not compile anymore
References: <43D5DD43 DOT 40108 AT verysmall DOT org> <43D5E1DE DOT 5090105 AT verysmall DOT org> <43D5E5CF DOT 32381331 AT dessent DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <43D5E5CF.32381331@dessent.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Brian Dessent wrote:
> "pobox AT verysmall DOT org" wrote:
> 
>> Tried to roll back to 1.5.18-1 from the setup.exe, but now I get 10s of
>> error messages from packages who do not find getline in the cygwin dll.
> 
> You would have to also use a previous version of any programs that need
> getline().  I think this includes findutils and coreutils.
> 
>> Could anybody help me to compile apache 1.3.34 under cygwin with this
>> getline change?
>>
>> I need it compiled because of php and related stuff.
> 
> The patch in PR9894 is more or less what you want.  It won't apply
> cleanly to 1.3.34 since it was generated against 1.3.24, but you get the
> idea.
> 
> You could also do something like "#define getline ap_getline" at the top
> of each of those three files, but the define would have to come after
> stdio.h has been included.
> 
> Brian

Hi Brian,

thanks for the help.

I submitted a bug at apache -

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38364

Now trying to compile apache 2.2.0 and depending on the result I'll try 
your suggestions as well, though I need something stable and I do not 
like to dive into patches.

It's kind of shocking situation, but I guess it could not have been avoided.

Thanks again,
Iv


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/