X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: ericblake AT comcast DOT net (Eric Blake) To: Bob Rossi , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: readline 5.1 question Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:31:30 +0000 Message-Id: <012020061631.16949.43D11062000875750000423522007614380A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Thanks very much. Is there any reason this important library isn't > installed by default? libreadline6 IS installed by default, but at version 5.0-4. As to why libreadline6-5.1-1 is not installed by default, it is because I marked the package experimental because it relied on features that weren't present in cygwin-1.5.18 at the time I released the package; along with the fact that bash/readline has notoriously had some major bugs every time a new release is made, so it is wise to wait a few weeks for the official upstream patches to settle out (thanks to Chet Ramey for keeping the version control repository of bash/readline private; I imagine a lot of those major bugs found on every release would be reduced somewhat if his development style were a bit more open. But that is my personal opinion, and a bit off-topic from your original question). I'm still reluctant to bump bash to 3.1 until I have packaged bash-3.1-2 with official upstream patches 2-5 as well as fixing the exec -l bug, and given that some more experimental test time. But now that cygwin-1.5.19 is out, and readline 5.1 has not yet had any official upstream patches (ie. it seems pretty stable), I will probably go ahead and bump readline to 5.1. -- Eric Blake -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/