X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:58:32 -0800 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: once more unto the breech - please try a snapshot so I can release this thing Message-ID: <20060115015832.GA3768@efn.org> References: <20060111022341 DOT GA31671 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20060111183537 DOT GA2840 AT efn DOT org> <20060112011708 DOT GC28207 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20060112064021 DOT GB3796 AT efn DOT org> <20060112064624 DOT GC3796 AT efn DOT org> <20060113013517 DOT GB10339 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060113013517.GB10339@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:35:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:46:24PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >Just in case it's relevant, note that I have experimental bash, > >readline, libreadline6, findutils, and coreutils. > > Does the latest snapshot behave any differently? Neither Corinna nor > I can duplicate this problem so neither of us can do anything other > than shoot in the dark to try to solve it. I haven't had it happen again using 20060112. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/