X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:47:02 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: services not starting with 20060104 snapshot
Message-ID: <20060105204702.GC26305@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <BAY108-F66824337AB6F827402541B52E0 AT phx DOT gbl> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0601051511000 DOT 24200 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20060105203241 DOT GA26305 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <43BD8335 DOT 2040501 AT cygwin DOT com> <20060105203915 DOT GB26305 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <43BD84DC DOT 8080106 AT cygwin DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43BD84DC.8080106@cygwin.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:43:08PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:36:05PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>
>>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:21:37PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>FWIW, I have only tested this with a self-built DLL, not the snapshot.
>>>>>Will do so shortly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Make sure that you update to the latest CVS.  I made some other changes
>>>>last night.  I don't see how they could resurrect this problem but, who
>>>>knows?
>>>
>>>I'm current as of 2:10 PM EST.  I think that covers everything up and 
>>>through
>>>the latest snapshot, right?
>>
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>Could you send another (compressed) strace log?
>>
>
>Sure.  But I can't run sshd as a service with the current snapshot or local
>build.  Do you want me to run it with a SYSTEM-owned shell or with the 
>latest
>snapshot (1/3?) that I can start sshd as a service useful?

No, nevermind.  Of course you can't send an strace if you can't start the
service.

cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/