X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: X-Sender: karlm30 AT hotmail DOT com In-Reply-To: <20060105060545.GA31370@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> From: "Karl M" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: services not starting with 20060104 snapshot Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 02:41:42 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >From: Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: services not starting with 20060104 >snapshot >Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:05:45 -0500 > >On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:42:56AM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote: > >On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:22:13PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote: > >> >On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >>On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:45:15PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote: > >> >>>On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>>On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:38:26PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote: > >> >>>>>Frankly, I'm not sure what the right fix would be in this case, or >even > >> >>>>>how to debug this... Any ideas on how I can simulate service >startup > >> >>>>>on the command line (to allow popping up gdb) would be greatly > >> >>>>>appreciated. > >> >>>> > >> >>>>Does the change I just checked into CVS cause any difference in > >> >>>>behavior? If not, could you also try changing the >CreateWindowStation > >> >>>>argument &sec_all_nih to NULL? > >> >>> > >> >>>Nope, sorry to say, neither helped. In both cases I got the same >error > >> >>>1053 when starting the service. The Windows error log messages are > >> >>>identical as well. > >> >> > >> >>How about the latest CVS? This will probably revert to the "ssh > >> >>localhost date" failing scenario, I assume. > >> > > >> >Sigh. Exactly. The service starts, though... > >> > > >> >I wonder if the service startup problem has to do with the fact that > >> >spawn_guts() calls GetProcessWindowStation() and isn't getting the one > >> >you create in fhandler_console::need_invisible()... Hmm, no, you call > >> >SetProcessWindowStation() there too... I can't think of a way for me > >> >to check whether it succeeds, though. > >> > >> Can you try inverting the (now) two CreateWindowStation calls in > >> need_invisible so that the "CygwinInvisible" case is called first and > >> the NULL case is called second? > > > >Nope, didn't work. The service doesn't start in this case. > > > >> And, if that doesn't work, then try commenting out the > >> CloseWindowStation. > > > >I wasn't sure whether you meant commenting it out after the swap or > >before, so I tried both. It didn't affect the behavior in either case > >(service not started with the swap; no output from ssh without the swap). > >Any and all combinations are welcome at this point. There seem to be an >infinite number of straws. > >Next straw would be to put a call to init_console_handler(TRUE); just >before >the call to CloseWindowStation: > > if (horig && h && h != horig && SetProcessWindowStation (horig)) > { > set_console_handler_true (TRUE); > CloseWindowStation (h); > } > > >> Also, what version of XP are you running? Pro? Is it up-to-date with > >> all service packs and updates? > > > >I'm running XP Pro SP1, with most updates applied (except KB835409 and > >KB910437, which are pending). > >Maybe that is a clue, as Yitzchak suggested. I'd missed that in the >cygcheck >output. I'm running SP2 and I believe Corinna is also. > I just tried the 200601040513 snapshot on two similar XP machines (except for SP1 on one, SP2 recently applied on the other) it works on SP2, I had to revert to 20060103 on the SP1 box. HTH, ...Karl -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/