X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:09:43 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: No takers?  (was Re: ssh localhost date # "ls -lu" => remote  command not being read)
Message-ID: <20060104010943.GC18616@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200512231711 DOT jBNHBvBl016124 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <200512241816 DOT jBOIGULc023975 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0512241947350 DOT 1926 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <200512261823 DOT jBQINIYK012941 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0512261557240 DOT 26685 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <200512262231 DOT jBQMVfiD014008 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <200512280538 DOT jBS5clef022489 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <20051230062711 DOT GA30157 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20060103225556 DOT GC15348 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0601031920550 DOT 13695 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0601031920550.13695@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:51:25PM -0500, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:27:11AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38:46PM -0600, Tom Rodman wrote:
>> >>Does the strace log hint at a solution?  Is there any other test I
>> >>might try that would help you debug this?
>> >
>> >The latest snapshot has better strace capabilities.  Rather than trying
>> >to munge your sshd service startup, please just start it as normal and,
>> >from a privileged account, use "strace -ostrace.out -pNNNN" to capture
>> >the output, where NNNN is the pid of the sshd process.  You need to do
>> >this from an account which has enough privileges to both find the sshd
>> >process and to allow strace to access it.  Either "ps -W" or taskman
>> >should show the pid of the running sshd.exe.
>> >
>> >Please use the latest DLL and the latest version of strace.exe from the
>> >snapshot: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>>
>> Is there any movement on this?  If multiple people can duplicate the
>> problem I would think that we'd have at least one person posting strace
>> results.
>
>Attached is the output of 'strace -f -p SSHD_PID' for ('uname -svr' =
>'CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.5.19(0.149/4/2) 2006-01-03 18:21').  Looks like the
>spawned bash process dies with exception C0000142, and Cygwin is unable to
>get the Windows exit code.  Since the actual output is over 250k, I've
>bzipped it.

That seems to be a kernel that you built yourself rather than a snapshot,
is that correct?  Can I assume that this is up-to-date with CVS?

cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/