X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Matched-Lists: []
Message-ID: <139020-22005123281993631@cantv.net>
Reply-To: rodmedina AT cantv DOT net
From: "Rodrigo Medina" <rodmedina AT cantv DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Why no-X11 ghostscript?
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:09:36 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi,
If I am not mistaken, gs-X11 does everything that gs-no-X11 does, then
why distributing gs-no-X11 at all? A lot problems may arise due to the
presence of two different programs with the same name.
Of course all the programs of the package should go into /bin.
Bye
Happy holidays
R.M.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/