X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Matched-Lists: [] Message-ID: <317460-22005122202324167@cantv.net> Reply-To: rodmedina AT cantv DOT net From: "Rodrigo Medina" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:02:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi, There are two different gs programs distributed, one linked to the X11 library which is put in /usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe and another no-X11 that goes into /bin/gs.exe. Here starts the problem: two different programs with the same name. Actually if you have X11 there is no reason of installing the gs-no-X11. Depending on your PATH you get one or the other. In relation to this there is the inconvenient dependence of transfig on gs-no-X11, which is automatically installed even if you have gs-X11. SETUP keeps trying to install gs-no-X11. A pain on the neck. Happy holidays R.M. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/