X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Berber?= Subject: Re: Where is patch? Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:35:14 -0600 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20051214200901 DOT GD29103 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20051215085654 DOT GP2399 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) In-Reply-To: <20051215085654.GP2399@calimero.vinschen.de> OpenPGP: url=ldap://keyserver.pgp.com X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: [snip] > Err... huh? [snip] After re-building patch 2.5.9 the problem (in the test case) does not appea= r. Conclusion: the currently distributed patch 2.5.9 was compiled with perhaps= an older Cygwin environment or at least one that made configure get a different result to "checking whether system is Windows or MSDOS... (cached) no" resu= lting in a patch that works different when files have CR (the test patchfile was a mixed CR-LF and LF line terminators). --=20 Ren=E9 Berber -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/