X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <43A0D84F.9090504@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:43:27 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050929 Thunderbird/1.0.7 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Where is patch? References: <43A064AD DOT 4050604 AT student DOT lu DOT se> <20051214200901 DOT GD29103 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20051214200901.GD29103@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:48:57PM -0600, Ren? Berber wrote: > >>Lennart Borgman wrote: >> >>>I am having trouble with patch. My Cygwin patch (and my GnuWin32 >>>patch) says it is version 2.5.9. But where is the sources for this? I >>>looked at ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/patch and they only have version 2.5.4. >>>How can that be? >> >>The latest GNU patch version compiles out of the box and it works >>better than the one distributed with Cygwin. By "works better" I mean >>that Cygwin's patch sometimes fail when GNU patch works perfect. > > > I've found that GNU patch doesn't work but cygwin's patch works just > fine. > > So, no need to panic. Eeeeeeeeeeks... huh? Oh sorry. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/