X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:05:11 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 'uptime' command producing incorrect uptime Message-ID: <20051212130511.GI17517@calimero.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <439B555A DOT 80803 AT ineedhosting DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <439B555A.80803@ineedhosting.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Dec 10 22:23, Jack wrote: > Hi there, > > It appears to me that the uptime command is not producing the correct > uptime and, in fact, is running twice as fast as it should be. > > M2Ys4U AT JACK ~ > $ uptime > 22:03:00 up 98 days, 13:37, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 > > M2Ys4U AT JACK ~ > $ uptime > 22:13:00 up 98 days, 13:57, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 > > 10 mins have passed, but the uptime has increased by 20 mins! > > I'm running a 3.0 GHz Intel P4 with hyperthreading - could the > hyperthreading be causing this? As Steve already mentioned, the function didn't take multiprocessor units into account. I've checked in a patch into CVS, my testing seem to indicate that it works now. Give the next snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ a try. Thanks for the report, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/