X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:54:20 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock') Message-ID: <20051212115420.GH17517@calimero.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Dec 11 22:44, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > > The problems described in > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00441.html > > are absent if one uses the snapshot 2005.10.24 12:04:00. > > Those problems appear at least from the snapshot 2005.11.17 and are > present also with the last snapshot 2005.12.10. > > [With the recent snapshots some commands of Emacs does not work correcly > (M-x compile, M-x recompile, M-x flyspell-mode ...): instead to be > executed Emacs says that 'alarm clock is setted at...'. One must try > several times (50%) to get the commands executed.] Could the xemacs maintainer please have a look into that and break this down into something which can be handled by a xemacs ignorant? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/