X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot References: <20051130171137 DOT GE2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> From: "Dr. Volker Zell" Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 19:16:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20051130171137.GE2999@calimero.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:11:37 +0100") Message-ID: <82vexwn7ha.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (Social Property, cygwin32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >>>>> Corinna Vinschen writes: > Since we're much too long on the way to the 1.5.19 release and there > are already way too many changes since 1.5.18, we would again like to > ask people for testing the latest snapshot, 2005-Nov-30, from > http://www.cygwin.com/snapshots/ > Please report back in this thread when you encounter a problem, which > you can't reproduce with 1.5.18. We're interested in regressions in > the first place. This is with the snapshot from 20051207: All subprocesses started from within xemacs behave like the following. This is for example an attempt to start a bash shell inside of xemacs: Process bash hangup Process not open for writing: # I'm on XPSP2 with all the latest cygwin packages. Ciao Volker -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/