X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:24:46 -0800
From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna AT efn DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Hang with 20051205 snapshot while building OOo
Message-ID: <20051209032446.GA5144@efn.org>
References: <43970AD1 DOT 8070704 AT scytek DOT de> <20051207181550 DOT GA22138 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20051208232301 DOT GA4300 AT efn DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051208232301.GA4300@efn.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 03:23:01PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:15:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:16:17PM +0100, Volker Quetschke wrote:
> > >We got some new features in the hangs with the 20051205 snapshot
> > >when building OOo.
> > >
> > >This trace looks a little bit different from the old versions,
> > >see thread around <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2005-10/msg00600.html>,
> > >but it still hangs.
> > 
> > It looks different because I took out all of the debugging strace
> > output that I added to try to track this down.
> > 
> > I'm convinced that the hang is coming from timeGetTime.  That's a
> > Windows routine and there's not much I can do if a windows routine
> > decides to take a long time to return.
> > 
> > So, in other words, I'm admitting defeat in this case, especially since
> > this isn't a regression from 1.5.18.
> 
> This is likely to enable a fix or workaround in cygwin, but is it

          ^un !

> possible that this is restricted to certain brands, models, or
> revisions of processor?  Am I correct in remembering that it happens
> only on some machines, Volker?
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/