X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:15:50 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Hang with 20051205 snapshot while building OOo Message-ID: <20051207181550.GA22138@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <43970AD1 DOT 8070704 AT scytek DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43970AD1.8070704@scytek.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:16:17PM +0100, Volker Quetschke wrote: >We got some new features in the hangs with the 20051205 snapshot >when building OOo. > >This trace looks a little bit different from the old versions, >see thread around , >but it still hangs. It looks different because I took out all of the debugging strace output that I added to try to track this down. I'm convinced that the hang is coming from timeGetTime. That's a Windows routine and there's not much I can do if a windows routine decides to take a long time to return. So, in other words, I'm admitting defeat in this case, especially since this isn't a regression from 1.5.18. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/