X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4396241B.5090401@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:51:55 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: octave-forge dependency? References: <20051206214756 DOT 94651 DOT qmail AT web51510 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> In-Reply-To: <20051206214756.94651.qmail@web51510.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com James R. Phillips wrote: > The octave-forge legend command requires tetex-bin. This came up in: > > http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/help-octave/2005/4239 Ok, thanks, that makes sense. I had a feeling the texinfo/makeinfo subthread was a red herring. I'll uninstall octave and all the, err, unwanted stuff, it forced into my installation and keep using matlab instead. The problem is, if both miktex and tetex are installed on my machine: If I put miktex in the front of PATH, the configury of some of the packages I maintain detects tetex -- but at runtime gets miktex executables, and barfs. This happened in some of the automake testsuites. If I don't put miktex in the front of my path, then the configury stuff is happy (finds tetex, uses tetex), but *I'm* not happy because *I* want to call miktex binaries from my cygwin interactive shell. My solution was to NOT install tetex; thus configury happy (no findee tetex) and I'm happy. But apparently I can't use octave. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/