X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Cary Jamison" Subject: Re: font Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:58:41 -0700 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <94BF3137C62D3E4CAED7E97F876585F0D03868 AT pauex2ku08 DOT agere DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In news:dmo3u0$1os$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org, Andrew DeFaria typed: > Cary Jamison wrote: > >> I'm always surprised at how many people recommened using rxvt. I use >> it once in a while, but there's just too many things I do don't work >> right unless I'm using the regular Win32 console. Output is delayed >> until the >> process exits, input is ignored, etc., etc. > > Too many things? Other than I/O (which I agree is important) of > certain Windows only programs what else does rxvt do wrong? I didn't say rxvt does anything wrong, I said there are 'too many things *I* do' that don't work right. Yes, it's all I/O related, but I'm often running windows scripts and programs as part of my normal tasks that don't work right with xterm/rxvt/etc. If I were doing pure Cygwin development, then I'm sure I would have few problems. Cary -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/