X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:49:42 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot (problem with inode numbers)
Message-ID: <20051203094941.GB2999@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20051130171137 DOT GE2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <57A85FA1-5088-4CB9-8998-9853FC0DDBB1 AT rehley DOT net> <20051201213806 DOT GM2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <9ED848C7-59B5-4009-BB85-5BCA9F5E3F53 AT rehley DOT net> <20051202111414 DOT GO2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <F645AE91-6E30-4137-A3A2-7DA78502C660 AT rehley DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F645AE91-6E30-4137-A3A2-7DA78502C660@rehley.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Dec  2 12:34, Peter Rehley wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >The problem is, that your Samba version apparently screws up the inode
> >information and we have re-enabled using the inode numbers sent from
> >remote file systems which are supposed to be capable of that.  For  
> >this
> >we use the HAS_PERSISTENT_ACLS property.
> >
> >What Samba version is your Mac OS X using?  I'm using 3.0.20a for  
> >which
> >the inode information is useable.  Is Samba a part of the OS  
> >packages or
> >did you install it from an external source?  Is it a rather old one?
> >Can you upgrade?  The problem is that there's no way for us to  
> >distinguish
> >between a newer and an older version of Samba.  I would rather not  
> >lose
> >the inode information when available.
> >
> I'm using mac os x 10.4.3 which is using samba version 3.0.10.  So  
> it's not that old.  However, I did find one reference that implied  
> that mac did something funny for acl's.
> 
> I'm going to try install a non-apple version of samba and see what  
> happens.

Keep us informed, please.  I'd rather keep the inode handling as it
is now, but we should at least know if there are ways to solve the
problem one way or the other.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/