X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:14:14 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot (problem with inode numbers) Message-ID: <20051202111414.GO2999@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20051130171137 DOT GE2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <57A85FA1-5088-4CB9-8998-9853FC0DDBB1 AT rehley DOT net> <20051201213806 DOT GM2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <9ED848C7-59B5-4009-BB85-5BCA9F5E3F53 AT rehley DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ED848C7-59B5-4009-BB85-5BCA9F5E3F53@rehley.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Dec 1 15:38, Peter Rehley wrote: > On Dec 1, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >On Dec 1 13:01, Peter Rehley wrote: > >> It only appears to be a problem > >>when I have a mac os x share mounted to a drive on windows. When I > >>try with a windows share or a linux share I don't seem to have the > >>problem. > >> > >>The problem that I'm seeing is that the inode value isn't unique when > >>listing a directory (or using any program that uses the inode value). > > > >Do I understand you right that this only happens for directories? The > >normal file inodes are looking ok? > No, it also happens for files too. $%^& > >The output of both tests might be helpful. > Output is attached. Well, the volume information looks exactly as usual for a remote Samba drive. The problem is, that your Samba version apparently screws up the inode information and we have re-enabled using the inode numbers sent from remote file systems which are supposed to be capable of that. For this we use the HAS_PERSISTENT_ACLS property. What Samba version is your Mac OS X using? I'm using 3.0.20a for which the inode information is useable. Is Samba a part of the OS packages or did you install it from an external source? Is it a rather old one? Can you upgrade? The problem is that there's no way for us to distinguish between a newer and an older version of Samba. I would rather not lose the inode information when available. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/