X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-T2-Posting-ID: dCnToGxhL58ot4EWY8b+QGwMembwLoz1X2yB7MdtIiA= Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:22:46 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mmap() on 64K aligned address fails Message-ID: <20051127222246.GJ5150@bouh.residence.ens-lyon.fr> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20051126180331 DOT GI5074 AT bouh DOT residence DOT ens-lyon DOT fr> <20051126214701 DOT GW5074 AT bouh DOT residence DOT ens-lyon DOT fr> <20051127130652 DOT GT2999 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i-nntp X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com René Berber, le Sun 27 Nov 2005 16:17:45 -0600, a écrit : > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > [snip] > >>mmap(0x470000, 4096, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_FIXED, fd, 0L) > >>somehow an invalid invocation. > > > > > > I didn't inspect the testcase all too closely since it's annoyingly long > > for such a simple test. But what exactly do you expect when trying to > > mmap an arbitrary memory address in the virtual address space which you > > know nothing about? > > It's not an arbitrary memory address, the 0x470000 is the result of aligning a > pagesize space into 17xpagesize malloced memory. Memmapping to malloced memory could very well be forbidden. Why would one want to do this? Regards, Samul -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/