X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20051123061647.01bab8d0@cic-mail.lanl.gov> X-Sender: u085598 AT cic-mail DOT lanl DOT gov Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:58:12 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Richard Kandarian Subject: Re: rcs 5.7 truncated one of my files In-Reply-To: <438469F7.4010608@byu.net> References: <6 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 20051122153707 DOT 01db9c28 AT cic-mail DOT lanl DOT gov> <4383A666 DOT 3020708 AT ukf DOT net> <438469F7 DOT 4010608 AT byu DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com At 06:09 AM 11/23/2005, Eric Blake wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >According to Max Bowsher on 11/22/2005 4:14 PM: > > > > RCS has not been updated in years. > >Could it be that RCS is still using 32-bit offsets because it has not been >recompiled against newer cygwin headers to turn on 64-bit offsets? You >can figure this out if the truncation is occuring on ,v files > 2 gig in size. > > > Can you find a way to reproduce the truncation? > > If you can, then it ought to be possible to find the problem. > > If you can't, this is likely going to remain an unsolved mystery. > >That is entirely true - without more details, especially a simple >testcase, very few people are motivated enough to try to help you resolve >the issue. > >- -- >Life is short - so eat dessert first! > >Eric Blake ebb9 AT byu DOT net >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) >Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg >Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > >iD8DBQFDhGn284KuGfSFAYARAmu2AJ0Yfotdg2NbFfTQ+juPrr5lOmIcsQCeOEVO >k2buKt2w1f3VXxCgA03NB00= >=/0CJ >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Who wants to have anything to do with a > 2 gig Perl script? Note the other clue in the preceding question. I notice that rcs has to double the @ characters it finds in Perl scripts. The new file $ ll mkbsub.ph -rw-r--r-- 1 085598 None 34319 Nov 22 16:44 mkbsub.ph The initial release rcs file: $ ll RCS.bak/mkbsub.ph,v -r--r--r-- 1 085598 None 32993 Nov 22 15:12 RCS.bak/mkbsub.ph,v The rcs file with the new file checked in $ ll RCS/mkbsub.ph,v -r--r--r-- 1 085598 None 13515 Nov 22 16:27 RCS/mkbsub.ph,v The new file checked out $ ll mkbsub.ph -rw-r--r-- 1 085598 None 1024 Nov 23 06:23 mkbsub.ph The part of RCS/mkbsub.ph,v that matches the truncation *exactly* but for the nine doubled @ characters. That size includes a final \n which is not in the truncated version. $ ll junk -rw-rw-rw- 1 085598 None 1034 Nov 23 06:33 junk I think the 1024 size of that penultimate file, mkbsub.ph, is very interesting. I hadn't noticed that before. The truncated file matches the beginning of the second version but does not match the beginning of the initial revision: $ diff -u0 junk mkbsub.ph --- junk 2005-11-23 06:42:11.001443900 -0700 +++ mkbsub.ph 2005-11-23 06:23:29.741722500 -0700 @@ -3,7 +3,3 @@ .... And junk, the equivalent portion of the initial revision, is 53 bytes bigger with one @ character more. I'll see if I can come up with any theories which might help me produce an example I can share. Thanks Richard Kandarian http://www.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/fonelink.pl/085598 Any opinions stated in this message are not expressed on behalf of any individual or entity other than me unless explicitly noted otherwise. My node in the Web: http://www.kandarian.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/