X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: FAO Teun Burgers [was RE: fltk package status] Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:43:16 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <420fb9e60511220935i38979f55n289a0bbb3c599e09@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Shai Ayal wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm not sure if this is the right list, but here it goes: Yes, it absolutely is. Maintainers don't like to be bothered at their private email addresses; the list is the place to make contact. You can try and get their attention by pinging them in the subject line if you like, such as I've done here. > Does anybody know who is the maintainer for the fltk package The generic way to find the maintainer of any cygwin package is to read the cygwin-specific documentation for that package in /usr/share/doc/Cygwin. > and if it > is going to be updates anytime soon? current package is 1.1.4, current > fltk version is 1.1.6, mainly bug fixes! At this point, we wait for Teun to respond. (Once you've found who the maintainer is, it's easy enough to take a look through the list archive and see if they've been active recently, which should give you some idea of whether to expect a reply or not, and whether the package is likely to be updated or not.) cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/