X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:40:52 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: PerlTk under Cygwin? Message-ID: <20051117144052.GA31368@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <297343D29C14AA4D822142893ABEAEF3DCFC29 AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <297343D29C14AA4D822142893ABEAEF3DCFC29@srv1163ex1.flightsafety.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 08:38:26AM -0600, Thrall, Bryan wrote: >Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote on Wednesday, November 16, 2005 5:44 PM: >>Bruce Dobrin wrote: >>>Well, obsolete or not, the tk800.025 for win32 from sourceforge is >>>building and working on 1.5.18 with it's perl5.8.5. Any chance a >>>non-obsolete version for win32 anytime? We use this native a lot. >> >>804.x doesn't build for Win32, and as X11 was working with only a minor >>patch and I didn't care either way, I decided to stop supporting Win32. >>You could take the source tarball from there and try recompiling with >>the current perl and see how that works for you. > >I'm curious about the patch you mention, since I maintain an internal >PerlTk Cygwin package for my company, and I haven't had any problems >OOTB (the last version I built was 804.027 against perl 5.8.7). > >And I'd love to have PerlTk officially packaged :-) If you're building it OOTB, you're only a couple of steps away from being a package maintainer. Want to volunteer? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/