Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <436E50DE.3070405@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:52:14 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: BUG: alternatives References: <436CF5E9 DOT 30106 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <001201c5e244$c9e50490$020aa8c0 AT DFW5RB41> <436D9993 DOT 7050100 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20051106134339 DOT GA24549 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20051106134339.GA24549@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > A signal shouldn't cause a truncated read when retrieving data from > disk on cygwin or linux. ACK. > I think the only sane way to handle this is to put the read in a loop > and realloc the buffer as needed as long as the read continues to return > '>0'. Ok. > It's obviously pretty racy to get the size of the file and then expect that > you'll be able to read in exactly that many bytes. ACK. Revised patch attached. I'm wondering, tho, about the advisability of using alloca'ed (rather than malloc'ed) memory to hold the contents of a file of unrestricted size. Aren't there limits on the available space within a single stack frame? Does it make sense (is it legal) to alloca 40k or 50k or 500k? of memory? Granted, most /var/lib/alternatives files are going to be fairly small (< 1k) but there's no guarantee of that... -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/