Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <436B81F8.7050100@scytek.de>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:44:56 -0500
From: Volker Quetschke <quetschke AT scytek DOT de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo
References: <4362FB42 DOT 2020804 AT scytek DOT de> <4367A1EC DOT 9050806 AT scytek DOT de> <4367E903 DOT 7080203 AT scytek DOT de> <20051101224030 DOT GA30658 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20051102182911 DOT GA9563 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4369185E DOT 8030308 AT scytek DOT de> <20051103050000 DOT GA788 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20051103150750 DOT GB3471 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <436A299B DOT 1010506 AT scytek DOT de> <436AA157 DOT 1070105 AT scytek DOT de> <20051104041516 DOT GB27444 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20051104041516.GB27444@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;  protocol="application/pgp-signature";  boundary="------------enig682CE3A6D939DF8ADF4F64E7"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--------------enig682CE3A6D939DF8ADF4F64E7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

(snip)
>>>>Corinna has informed me that I added the debugging output to the wrong place
>>>>so I'm generating a new snapshot with the right debugging.  Please use the
>>>>November 3 snapshot in your tests.
(snip)
> GAH! What a stupid mistake.  I made a change and didn't check it.  There
> was a reason why there was no debugging statements in the code that I
> modified.
> 
> The latest snapshot seems to work.  I even (gasp!) tested it.
:) Yes, it works.

Here is the latest strace: <http://www.scytek.de/tc4_20051103.tar.bz2>

Even though it is the correct snapshot I didn't see many of your
debug statements in the strace.

Volker

-- 
PGP/GPG key  (ID: 0x9F8A785D)  available  from  wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913  9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D

--------------enig682CE3A6D939DF8ADF4F64E7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MinGW)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDa4H8PTXJup+KeF0RAp8ZAKCKYwNjMp7RlX1ijJJy7FQox3z0hgCgnExA
+MMHorJqVmKwJOjwk+2IjuQ=
=WNhP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig682CE3A6D939DF8ADF4F64E7--