Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-ORBL: [69.104.140.245] Message-ID: <4360ADDF.8050503@myrealbox.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:37:19 -0700 From: Tim Prince Reply-To: tprince AT computer DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050921 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: AllVersions: Running Cygwin X w/ Registy Entries References: <1130262948 DOT 435e71a4abd76 AT webmail DOT mail DOT gatech DOT edu> <1130283941 DOT 435ec3a5672f2 AT webmail DOT mail DOT gatech DOT edu> <4kmnzwxkibr0.1rd655owgqdi6$.dlg AT 40tude DOT net> <20051026143731 DOT GA1936 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <1g329hewnak2$.1knc01godo1ld DOT dlg AT 40tude DOT net> <435FB109 DOT 30506 AT equate DOT dyndns DOT org> <4360A2BA DOT 8070704 AT equate DOT dyndns DOT org> In-Reply-To: <4360A2BA.8070704@equate.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Taylor wrote: > It's not *directly* editing the registry. As a sysadmin, I'm telling you > it *is* different. > The (l)user should *never* be allowed to edit the registry themselves. > That's a recipe for disaster. > In my book, this includes so-called junior sysadmins/techs/whatever. > No one should be allowed to make software which puts the (l)user in the position of having to use registry tools. But, this will not happen. For example, it is practically impossible to use Windows outside a corporate environment without installing something from SBC which habitually messes up the registry. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/