Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <435FD8E9.3090509@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:28:41 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ITP] run.exe was Re: Running ssh in background [solution/patch] References: <435F56CB DOT 4EBEB22C AT dessent DOT net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alexander Gottwald wrote: >>Incidentally, I have a few patches to run.exe. Where should I send them? Err...dunno. I'd say cygwin mailing list, because both I(*) and ago will see them there. (*) as if it matters :-) > To me. I did not found any canonical upstream location anymore. Technically, the upstream location is http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/run/index.html but that version was originally adapted (by me) from a similar program distributed by XEmacs (I think there was also some later cross-pollination between "my" version and the XEmacs one) However, I haven't actively maintained the fruitbat.org version in AGES -- once run.exe was absorbed into the cygwin-x distro and then subsequently forked, I didn't see the need: as far as I was concerned, the "official" one was the one maintained by the X folks, and my "original" was simply a historical footnote. I am *not* upset about this, and it was perfectly GPL-acceptable for Suhaib(I think) to have absorbed run.exe into the x-dist instead of asking Xusers to download an unofficial non-setup-compatible utility from some-randome-website. > It seems > "Charles S. Wilson once wrote this but there have been many patches > since it was packaged in X-startup-scripts. Yes, that is absolutely true. Even I consider the x-startup-scripts version to be the canonical cygwin run.exe. I'm willing to "re-take" run.exe and incorporate it into the cygutils pakcage IF Brian/Igor/ago want me to do so; otherwise I fully support Brian's ITP of run as an independent package. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/