Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: AllVersions: Running Cygwin X w/ Registy Entries Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:48:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <1g329hewnak2$.1knc01godo1ld.dlg@40tude.net> Message-ID: Thorsten Kampe wrote: > * Christopher Faylor (2005-10-26 15:37 +0100) >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >>> Try "regedit /s" in a batch (instead of double clicking). This >>> sometimes works. >> Or, I dunno, if that works, you could just use "mount" and forget about >> regedit entirely. >> >> It's a crazy idea, I know. I wonder why no one has thought of it before. > > *I* didn't know about it (because I was under the impression that all > cygwin programs depend on the mount tables). > > Well, obviously there are a few that don't (mount, [...SNIP!...] Let me see if I can parse those last two sentences: You didn't know about using "mount" to manipulate the mount tables because you thought that all cygwin programs depend on the mount tables .... except for "mount", which you already knew didn't depend on the mount tables? This conversation has now descended into self-contradictory gibberish, and as such I find myself forced to run around the room in circles, flapping my arms like a chicken and making clucking noises. TITTTL! TITTTL! TITTTL! > And I think it's easier to just import a reg file than dealing with > multiple mount commands... Wow. You're going to just _love_ scripting, when you hear about it! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/