Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <435EDFA3.E5F66701@dessent.net> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:45:07 -0700 From: Brian Dessent MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin-setup & rebaseall References: <435D743F DOT EDB6FBB9 AT dessent DOT net> <435DBB31 DOT 5C164C83 AT dessent DOT net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Satish Balay wrote: > Doesn't setup have similar problem with updating 'packages' for > running apps? I think it prompts for a reboot to complete. So I'm > guessing the same approach can be used when it needs a rebase. Yes, of course setup already has that logic. That's what I was referring to above about name.dll.new. My point was that you can't just have setup call the rebaseall script as a final step because the "in use handling" of the two has to be in sync. It has to be tightly integrated. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/