Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Todd Rearick Subject: Re: Socket read problem on Windows XP Pro & Cygwin Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <20051022035348.RADA2767.eastrmmtao03.cox.net@[172.18.52.8]> <4359C50C DOT 76649CA1 AT dessent DOT net> <4359EB14 DOT E677A317 AT dessent DOT net> <435AAAB9 DOT 27CDE133 AT dessent DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Brian Dessent dessent.net> writes: > What I was trying to emphasize is that passing "COM4" to open() in a > Cygwin program sets you up for a world of hurt... > > Brian It's even worse than you think. In this case...COM4 is not even a real serial port...but a "virtual" serial port constructed by a USB driver. Fortunately for me...because it's not a real port...I don't actually need to configure it at all.... I'm actually quite impressed that I can even open COM ports and write to them and it all seems to work OK via cygwin. Thanks for the warning and the help. Todd -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/