Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:38:09 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.4 (2005 Oct 15, compiled Oct 17 2005 11:54:34 Message-ID: <20051020163809.GA18643@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20051020144227 DOT GB28514 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:26:58PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:15:34PM +0200, Christoph Jeksa wrote: >>>there is a bug in this version: >>> >>>Supposed, you have a file X.sh ( exactly in this spelling ). If you >>>enter: >>> >>>vim x.sh ( also exactly in this spelling ) >>> >>>and write it back after any modification, the file will be renamed even >>>to x.sh. This behavior is very nasty if such file is used by programs >>>which are case-sensitive for file names, example: SCM program perforce. >> >>This isn't a vim problem. Windows filename handling is >>case-insensitive. >> >>I suppose that there could be a vim option to deal with this case but >>that would require modifying vim, i.e., PTC* by the upstream vim >>developers. > >Chris, I suppose there's another bet between you and Corinna floaing >around in the cygwin-developers land somewhere, but I'll bite. What's the euro/dollar exchange rate these days? >No need to patch vim. This is *exactly* the kind of situation where >check_case:strict is useful. With CYGWIN=check_case:strict, vim won't >even edit the file "x.sh" if the file is actually named "X.sh". >Incidentally, "check_case:adjust" might also help. You're right, I didn't consider recommending an option that Corinna and I consider to be deprecated. Using this option is *guaranteed* to slow Cygwin down and, given that both Corinna and I detest the complications and slow down this option entails, it is entirely possible that it will be broken from time to time. At the risk of being self-indulgent and winning some more bets, I also didn't mention the overkill option of using managed mounts. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/