Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:33:27 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mlockall() and cygwin Message-ID: <20051013123327.GH2908@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20051013113609 DOT GF2908 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20051013121056 DOT 6804 DOT qmail AT web25607 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051013121056.6804.qmail@web25607.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Oct 13 14:10, Mohamed Amjed Ben Salah wrote: > --- Corinna Vinschen a http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR > > mlockall will probably never be implemented since > > there's no support > > for it on user mode level in Win32. There's support > > for something like > > mlock/munlock, but only on NT and it's also not > > implemented in Cygwin. > > > > Try building and running without calling mlockall. > > Ist it possible to install eposix on cygwin, and then > to use mlockall() ? I saw the documentation of eposix, > and it seems implemented, but I never used eposix. Er... how is that supposed to work? eposix is just a library on top of the underlying OS. It's an eiffel binding for POSIX routines, nothing else. And apart from that, it doesn't even try to implement mlockall. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/