Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <434D6EA1.6090203@familiehaase.de> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:14:25 +0200 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Windows update vs. cygrunsrv References: <101220051545 DOT 21471 DOT 434D2FA800096FCD000053DF22007613940A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mike Stockman wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: > >> I don't know it this was unique to my machine, but am >> reporting it in case anyone else runs into the same >> issue. When running Microsoft update today, on Win2k, >> the patch for Security Update for DirectX 9 for Windows >> 2000 (KB904706) hung during installation, with an >> instance of cygrunsrv hogging 100% CPU, until I had >> stopped every last one of my cygrunsrv processes. I >> don't know what the Microsoft update was trying to do >> to running services during the update, but it obviously >> didn't interact very well with cygrunsrv. I saw similar problems when running process explorer, IIRC the affected service was cygserver, though I'm not sure. This leads to my thought that the tool to discover malicious software may be the culprit since it scans all running processes, may be the DirectX setup performs similar scans? Gerrit -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/