Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:52:58 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gethostbyname_r Message-ID: <20051011185258.GB22401@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20051011143306 DOT GI12938 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <434BE411 DOT 4060702 AT air2web DOT com> <20051011164433 DOT GB15402 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <434BF7F0 DOT 7040001 AT air2web DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <434BF7F0.7040001@air2web.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:35:44PM -0400, Richard Campbell wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>AFAIK, cygwin's gethostbyname is thread safe in all cases. > >Since I was referencing you for the proposition that it was not thread >safe in the case of resolving a numeric IP, >(http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-05/msg00182.html ) I'll certainly >defer to you. The thread-safeness problem was fixed in February of this year. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/